Two disheartening accounts from ida-india
Story 1:
Police file criminal case against Municipal workers for killing dogs
By K. S. Satagopan
When some employees of the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) allegedly strewed poisoned food on the roadside in the Viman Nagar area with an intention to kill dogs, clearly violating relevant laws once again in January last, they may have not thought they would be arrested and were landing themselves in courts, this time. A resident of the area Diana Ratnagar who had the shock and agony of seeing her 5 dogs dropping dead one after another in quick succession as result of swallowing those bites, could suspect criminal mischief (allegedly repeated as a matter of course) and on examination, a registered veterinarian certified that the death had been “caused by poisoning.” Determined this time to get justice done for those innocent victims, she lodged a complaint with the Pune police and her unflinching determination took her nearly 6 months to get the police to act and eventually two workers of the PMC were arrested (and later released on bail) in July last on charges under Sections 34, 284 and 428 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Sec. (Z4)X(1) of The Bombay Police Act (BPA).
While Sec. (Z4)X(1) of BPA states that “No stray dogs shall be killed as a rule…” IPC Sec. 428 covers mischief committed by killing, maiming etc. of animals, and Sec. 284 is concerned with negligent conduct with respect of poisonous substances. Perhaps Sec. 34 should be of special concern to the higher-ups in a local body. It provides for implicating also those who support, encourage and protect the person(s) actually committing a criminal act. That explains why the police have implicated the PMC itself in the criminal case.
It is also learnt that in March last, another Pune resident Meenal Jogdev who was on a walk with her two Labrador dogs on a leash has had the same shock of seeing her companions dropping dead after swallowing ‘something’ on the roadside. Identical has been the fate of Khurshid Chaudhuri’s 7 dogs, which fell dead on 22nd August last year. So is the story of several other dogs including those of Asha Doshi, Rakesh Jagtap, Deepti Dalvi, Pradeep Joshi and others of Pune.
Speaking to this scribe, Ratnagar, who seems equally concerned with the safety of humans, asks, what if a poor child swallows a piece of the strewed lot or what about those untargeted animals like cows and calves, and birds which might fall victims, and wonders whether the law of the land provides for killing healthy dogs. Describing the modus operandi, she says, “Some dogs do react in a threatening manner when teased or provoked. But, on this, when someone lodges a complaint with the PMC, the latter knowing very well that it is illegal to kill dogs, makes a pact with the former to strew poisoned food on the roadside and the result is that every time this is done, some 25 unsuspecting dogs fall dead. What’s more, the carcasses are almost immediately collected by the garbage collection squad, leaving no trace of evidence, with the PMC pleading complete innocence.”
As for other areas in the country, this scribe learns from the former film actress Amala Akkineni who runs the Blue Cross society at Hyderabad that the local municipality has stopped poisoning dogs, though other sources maintain that the local body still does it but denies doing so. But Amala adds that it happened 6 months ago in Vijayawada and Malkajgiri (also of Andhra Pradhesh). As for Karnataka, sources from Bangalore in anonymity contend that dogs have been poisoned in Kolar. According to sources including this scribe himself, stray dogs have been beaten to death or killed by injecting poison in Tamilnadu.
It seems likely that the practice is also in vogue in some other states like Kerala. But undoubtedly the latest instance from Pune has squarely caught the attention of law and that could perhaps be an eye-opener for administrators and authorities at various levels in the country.
Perhaps the local bodies in the country must take note; perhaps the state governments should instruct them to mind propriety, stipulated rules and procedures that have a bearing on such issues. As for an instance, Khurshid Chaudhuri points out that the Mumbai High Court in its “Comprehensive Guidelines for Dog Control and Management” has laid down that even stray dogs shall not be killed as a rule, making an exception only in the case of fatally injured, incurably ill, and rabid dogs (Sec. (Z4)X(1) of The BPA). Even the exception is made “with the sole object of relieving [the dog] of the pain of such sickness, injuries or rabies…” The honourable court has also laid down “Rules for capturing, sterilization [birth control], immunization [against rabies] and release of dogs.” (Note release, the court has insisted on the release of the dogs in the same area from where they were captured). After all, our constitution itself, by its Article 51A(g), enjoins upon us as a fundamental duty “…to have compassion for all living creatures,” she adds.
source
Story 2 (rather gruesome):
IDA-India Seeks Justice for 17 Dogs Burned to Death
Complaint triggers official inquiry by Animal Welfare Board of India
In response to a complaint filed by IDA-India, the Animal Welfare Board of India (AWBI) has launched an inquiry into the mass-burning of 17 homeless dogs at Shwan Nasbandi Kendra, a municipal sterilization center. The dogs were killed in this brutal manner by shelter personnel "in the interest of public health." Officials who ordered the flaming execution claimed the animals were "rabid, diseased and violent," and could create "unhygienic conditions" that might compromise the health of other canine residents.
While the center did have legal permission to dispatch of the dogs, IDA-India and AWBI both maintain that burning the dogs to death, even for suspected rabies, was illegal as well as unconscionable. IDA-India informed AWBI of the violation after getting a tip from a local resident and animal lover on April 4. IDA-India president Fizzah Shah and two colleagues soon made a personal visit to the center to determine whether the report was true.
To their great horror, it was. Among piles of singed hair and blackened collars, they found the charred bodies of 17 dogs dumped on the ground in back of the locked sterilization facility. According to Shah's testimony, "It was clear that dog burning was a regular practice over there." The kennels and operating room were also disgustingly filthy and lacked proper drainage systems.
The center's mission is to collect stray dogs from the streets, sterilize them, and release them after monitoring their health for five days. However, IDA-India found out from local residents that the killing has been going on for at least two years, and that the dogs barely get any food and water. Even after this scandal, police have so far refused to investigate, claiming that no offense has been proven and indifferently rejecting any evidence to the contrary.
In the face of police inaction, IDA-India used the local cable TV station to break the story. News cameras captured the sight, if not the horrible smell, of burned and rotting dog carcasses scattered like trash behind the center. They also filmed the 12 remaining dogs, who police had locked inside without food or water. The footage was broadcast throughout the Bhiwandi area. The AWBI inquiry is still pending.
source
I'm bewildered by the actions of the officials. That they have strayed so far from their original mission is apparent. And this was their solution to the overpopulation? This "Let's just kill everything" mentality is tiring. And to condemn the dogs to a fiery death? It is inhumane and vile. No living being deserves that fate.
I stand by what I've said before: if we can't end our exploitation and violence towards non-human animals, we have no hope of ending it amongst our own species.
It's so disheartening to hear, watch, or read of the endless acts of violence. You'd think that we could get our act together, as we all share space on this precious planet, but I don't think that will ever happen. What a silly, stupid, selfish species we are. I'm rambling here but there are just moments when the whole deal becomes overwhelming.
3 comments:
I'd like to comment on the Diana Ratnagar story. I used to live 5 minutes from Diana's house in Viman Nagar, when the poisoning incident occurred. The SPCA contacted me and asked me to go and see what had happened only minutes after the dogs had been poisoned.
The fact of the matter is that Diana had been feeding 5-6 dogs outside her house. They used to chase cars, run after two wheelers, bark all night and bite kids, all of which had been brought to Diana's attention. Nothing was done about it. Out of frustration the municipal corporation came and poisoned the dogs.
I think the poisoning was a cruel and inhumane way of dealing with the problem. But the person responsible for the painful deaths of those dogs was Diana herself. If she was interested in the welfare of those dogs she should have ensured that they remained inside her compound. She should have been fined heavily for not only endangering people of the area but also for lousy pet ownership.
Interestingly, at the time she had two pedigreed dogs living safely in the comfort of her home. This shows the double standards of all those who like to keep and feed out on the streets. One really has to wonder what point they're making and to whom.
Meghna Uniyal
Meghna,
Thank you for commenting with your point of view about this situation. It's unfortunate it ended the way it did. And I agree that the fault is equal between the authorities and Diana herself.
i fail to see why she has "double standards". By that kind of reasoning if i give a homeless person on the street some money for a meal but dont take him to my home and let him live there, and at the same time i indeed let a friend share my home, i would have "double standards" ? She simple has two pet dogs inside the house and tries to help some stray dogs by feeding them regularly. If they are a nuisance it doesnt give anybody the right to poison them and less to put the blame at the person who at least cares for these dogs.
i think its not a case of "making a point and to whom" its simply somebody taking care of straydogs.
All over i see people whith this narrowmindedness for animals wether its straydogs or pigeons who shit, or mice or rats and the answer of these people is always kill kill kill because the animals are so called nuisances.
Post a Comment